by:
Terrence Moore
Republished
with permission from the author
"Cela aurait été bien dit, fût-ce grammaticalement correct"
(Publié avec la permission de l'auteur)
No one likes a pedant.
Notwithstanding this caveat, it must be observed that at the grammar stage of
learning, children ought to learn how to speak and write grammatically.
Children are much easier to teach when young than when they have already formed
bad habits from the vernacular speech they hear every day. They develop bad
habits quickly. Upper elementary and middle school students who are corrected
for improper grammar will respond, "But that doesn’t sound right."
Unfortunately, students are often better reporters than philologists. They say
what they hear but do not always love correct speaking.
Teachers and parents should
indefatigably try to break older students of bad grammar and to form younger
students’ speech with good [grammar]. That means we ourselves must speak not good,
but well. We have seen the enemy, and they are we. Should the reader
need a refresher course in the Queen’s English, I shall canvass the five most
common grammatical mistakes committed these days. Further review might be found
in the standard classics: Strunk and White’s The Elements of Style,
Warriner’s Grammar and Composition, and Fowler’s Modern English Usage.
Less/fewer.
Fewer refers to a smaller number of
people or things that can be counted. Less indicates a smaller quantity
of a whole substance or idea. Shakespeare’s Henry V announces before the battle
of Agincourt, "The fewer men, the greater share of honor."
Shakespeare’s Somerset says in I Henry VI, "I owe him little duty, and less
love." Supermarkets most commonly bungle this distinction, though some are
starting to get it right. "Ten items or less" should read "ten
items or fewer" or, better still, "ten or fewer items." (Express
lanes might actually live up to their name if the words cash only were
also added.)
Confusion
of subjective and objective pronouns. Who is in the subjective, or nominative, case. Whom is
in the objective case. "Who are you going to the dance with?" asks
the ungrammatical student, rather than, "With whom are you going to
the dance?" In this case, whom is the object of the preposition.
The direct object works similarly: "Whom did Jack take to the dance?"
Increasingly, I hear a less forgivable barbarism. "Me and Jenny want to
know what our grades are." The correct usage is, of course, "Jenny
and I." The nominative is used no matter where it occurs in the sentence.
Therefore, "Arnold is more muscular than I (am)." Poe provides
a memorable example. "She was a child and I was a child,/In this
kingdom by the sea,/But we loved with a love that was more than love—/I
and my Annabel Lee."
The
subjunctive. The
subjunctive mood of a verb expresses conditions contrary to fact or wishes. The
subjunctive were replaces the indicative was. One does not say,
"If I was you, etc." Lady Macbeth thrice reminds us of this rule:
"If it were done when ’tis done, then ’twere well it were done quickly."
The delightfully caustic exchange between Churchill and Lady Astor is another
lesson. "Winston, if I were your wife, I’d poison your soup."
"Nancy, if I were your husband, I’d drink it."
Adjectives/adverbs. Desdemona and Emilia in Othello
show the distinction nicely. "This Lodovico is a proper man." "A
very handsome man." "He speaks well." Desdemona might have also
said, "He speaks properly." Thus, the well-spoken and proper man does
not bring flowers to the soloist after a concert and say, "You sang real
good." Good is an adjective and therefore cannot modify the verb. Real
should be converted to the adverb really in order to modify well,
which in turn would modify the verb sang. But, you may argue that we
say, "This tastes good." Indeed, we do. The verbs of
sense—feel, smell, taste, and sound—are followed by an adjective. The
expression feel badly is actually incorrect unless you have numb fingers
and cannot sense things by touch.
Agreement
in number. Subjects must agree with verbs,
and pronouns must agree with their antecedents. Contractions often hide this
common error. "Here’s the answers for the test," should obviously be
rendered, "Here are the answers for the test." Even more prevalent is
the construction, "Everyone needs to take out their pencils."
What begins in the singular must end in the singular. Every dog doesn’t have their
days; every dog has his day.
In short, were each teacher to have
his students speak well and to use good grammar, he would commit fewer
grammatical mistakes of his own and help his charges speak better than we.
*Terrence O.
Moore was the principal of Ridgeview Classical Schools, a K-12 charter school
in Colorado, for seven years and now teaches history at Hillsdale College in
Michigan.
Other articles written by him appear on http://www.ashbrook.org/
Comments
One response to “‘Twere Well Said, Were it Said Grammatically”
A very interesting article Jonathan. Thank you for sharing it with us. Speaking of the subjunctive (almost never used in English) I see more and more ESL books that allow “if I was you…”
Another case of the subjunctive (we don’t even know this word in English! ) is something like: “It is vital that you be vaccinated against malaria, if you are travelling to Asia,” whereas many people would say “you” with “are.”